Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 477 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Player Trade results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Overconfidence Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 472 hits . Analysis detected 2,609 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,908 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 78% (3,606 of 15,854 topics). This Player Trade is worse (more manipulative) than 77.30% of the peer group. Player Trade
Topic details
Total words: 1,908
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.3% percentile 5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 24.7% 24.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 13.9% 13.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.7%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst