Topic summary
⁠96%2 analyzed articles/videos723 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Player Rivalries results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.3% saturation with 528 hits. Analysis detected 3,329 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,169 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (4,951 of 16,558 topics). This Player Rivalries is worse (more manipulative) than 70.10% of the peer group.
Player Rivalries
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,169
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.1% percentile
4.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.6%16.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.9%18.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 24.3%24.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.2%11.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 24.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Bandwagon: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos