Topic summary
⁠13%1 analyzed article/video800 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Player Profile results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 182 hits. Analysis detected 1,451 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,200 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (16,078 of 23,186 topics). This Player Profile is better (less manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group.
Player Profile
Topic details
Total words: 3,200
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510030.7% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.2%2.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.3%Indoctrination: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos