Topic summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video189 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Player Controversies results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 89 hits. Analysis detected 562 faulty-reasoning hits from 567 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,587 of 16,562 topics). This Player Controversies is worse (more manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.
Player Controversies
Topic details
Total words: 567
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510072.3% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles567 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.4%13.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.3%5.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos