Topic summary
⁠1%1 analyzed article/video354 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Player Activation results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 1.7% saturation with 18 hits. Analysis detected 50 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,062 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (16,456 of 16,562 topics). This Player Activation is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group.
Player Activation
Topic details
Total words: 1,062
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

1% percentile
02550751000.6% percentile
0.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos