Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video870 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Planned Parenthood results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Slippery Slope, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 695 hits. Analysis detected 5,037 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,610 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (3,098 of 16,562 topics). This Planned Parenthood is worse (more manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group.
Planned Parenthood
Topic details
Total words: 2,610
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510081.3% percentile
5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 12.2%12.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 23.5%23.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 10.0%10.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 7.2%7.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 8.5%8.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 12.2%12.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 26.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 23.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 2.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 0.4%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.4%Personal Incredulity: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Special Pleading: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos