Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,562 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pizza results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.2% saturation with 1,885 hits. Analysis detected 5,817 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,248 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (8,637 of 15,447 topics). This Pizza is better (less manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Pizza
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,248
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510044.1% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 30.2%30.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 17.5%17.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 30.2%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos