Topic summary
2%1 analyzed article/video266 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pinellas results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Optimism Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 4% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 169 faulty-reasoning hits from 798 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 36% (10,730 of 16,562 topics). This Pinellas is better (less manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group.
Pinellas
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 798
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510035.2% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles798 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 4.0%4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos