Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Pig Rescue results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 150 hits. Analysis detected 683 faulty-reasoning hits from 805 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Pig Rescue is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Pig Rescue
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 805
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles805 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 18.6%18.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.6%4.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.6%18.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Topic 2.9%2.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 3.5%3.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 17.3%17.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Special Pleading: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos