Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 3,056 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Picky Eating results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Confirmation Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 1,301 hits . Analysis detected 6,995 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,168 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (12,669 of 16,562 topics). This Picky Eating is better (less manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group. Picky Eating
Topic details
Total words: 9,168
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 14.2% 14.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.8%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.4% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst