Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video275 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Physiology results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 103 hits. Analysis detected 564 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (6,216 of 16,562 topics). This Physiology is worse (more manipulative) than 62.50% of the peer group.
Physiology
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠63%Physiology (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,100
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510062.5% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.4%4.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 7.8%7.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.0%5.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos