Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Physiological Effects Of Sports Fandom results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 392 hits. Analysis detected 3,012 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,741 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Physiological Effects Of Sports Fandom is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Physiological Effects Of Sports Fandom
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,741
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 9.1%9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.5%10.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.5%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 9.1%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos