Topic summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video80 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phoenix Weather results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 32.5% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 253 faulty-reasoning hits from 240 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (931 of 16,562 topics). This Phoenix Weather is worse (more manipulative) than 94.40% of the peer group.
Phoenix Weather
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 240
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

94% percentile
025507510094.4% percentile
11.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles240 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.3%11.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 32.5%32.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 15.4%15.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.5%12.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.9%7.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.7%6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 32.5%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Recency Bias: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos