Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video3,269 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pharmaceutical Regulation results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 752 hits. Analysis detected 5,809 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,076 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (16,147 of 16,562 topics). This Pharmaceutical Regulation is better (less manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group.
Pharmaceutical Regulation
Topic details
Total words: 13,076
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

3% percentile
02550751002.5% percentile
1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles13.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos