Topic summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video1,197 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pet Care Costs results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 568 hits. Analysis detected 2,917 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,591 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,493 of 16,562 topics). This Pet Care Costs is better (less manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group.
Pet Care Costs
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,591
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510048.7% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.2%12.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 4.9%4.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos