Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Personal Information Protection results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and Overconfidence Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 43.3% saturation with 990 hits. Analysis detected 4,834 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,289 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Personal Information Protection is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Personal Information Protection
Topic details
Total words: 2,289
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 43.3%43.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 22.4%22.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.5%13.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 18.5%18.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.1%9.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 13.7%13.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.1%11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 8.4%8.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 43.3%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 22.4%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.4%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos