Topic summary
⁠34%2 analyzed articles/videos4,237 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Performance Enhancement results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 1,081 hits. Analysis detected 8,603 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,711 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (14,131 of 16,562 topics). This Performance Enhancement is better (less manipulative) than 85.30% of the peer group.
Performance Enhancement
Topic details
Total words: 12,711
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

15% percentile
025507510014.7% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos