Topic summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video875 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Performance Based Contracts results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Optimism Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 278 hits. Analysis detected 2,236 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (11,554 of 23,271 topics). This Performance Based Contracts is worse (more manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group.
Performance Based Contracts
Topic details
Total words: 3,500
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510050.4% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Middle Ground: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos