Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,568 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pentagon Reforms results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 805 hits. Analysis detected 7,346 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,272 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (10,104 of 16,562 topics). This Pentagon Reforms is better (less manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group.
Pentagon Reforms
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,272
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510039.0% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 12.8%12.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.6%10.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.0%12.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos