Topic summary
3%1 analyzed article/video1,158 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pennsylvania Supreme Court results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Begging the Question, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 134 hits. Analysis detected 1,357 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,474 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (15,239 of 16,562 topics). This Pennsylvania Supreme Court is better (less manipulative) than 92.00% of the peer group.
Pennsylvania Supreme Court
Topic details
Total words: 3,474
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

8% percentile
02550751008.0% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.3%3.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.0%Special Pleading: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.3%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos