Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video719 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pediatric Healthcare results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 440 hits. Analysis detected 2,590 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,876 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,553 of 15,802 topics). This Pediatric Healthcare is worse (more manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Pediatric Healthcare
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠53%Pediatric Healthcare (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,876
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510052.2% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.3%12.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos