Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video46 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pediatric Cancer Bill results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 71.7% saturation with 99 hits. Analysis detected 778 faulty-reasoning hits from 138 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (40 of 16,562 topics). This Pediatric Cancer Bill is worse (more manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group.
Pediatric Cancer Bill
Topic details
Total words: 138
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

100% percentile
025507510099.8% percentile
37.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles138 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 71.7%71.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 71.7%71.7%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 47.8%47.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 71.7%71.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 47.8%47.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 47.8%47.8%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Topic 23.9%23.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 23.9%23.9%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 23.9%23.9%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 23.9%23.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Topic 71.7%, sitewide 26.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 71.7%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 71.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 47.8%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 47.8%, sitewide 3.3%Red Herring: Topic 47.8%, sitewide 0.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 28.3%, sitewide 11.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 23.9%, sitewide 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 23.9%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 23.9%, sitewide 4.0%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 23.9%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 23.9%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 23.9%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 23.9%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 6.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos