Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,609 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peace Plan results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 764 hits. Analysis detected 6,706 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,436 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,815 of 16,562 topics). This Peace Plan is better (less manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group.
Peace Plan
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,436
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510046.8% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.3%11.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.9%11.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.6%9.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos