Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos993 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peace Agreement results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Overconfidence Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 746 hits. Analysis detected 4,295 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,496 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,833 of 16,562 topics). This Peace Agreement is better (less manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
Peace Agreement
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,496
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510046.7% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 8.3%8.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos