Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video996 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patient Access To Medication results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 182 hits. Analysis detected 1,300 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,984 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (15,011 of 16,562 topics). This Patient Access To Medication is better (less manipulative) than 90.60% of the peer group.
Patient Access To Medication
Topic details
Total words: 3,984
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

9% percentile
02550751009.4% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Red Herring: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos