Topic summary
⁠77%2 analyzed articles/videos2,166 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Party Leadership results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 1,306 hits. Analysis detected 10,266 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,664 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (9,886 of 22,963 topics). This Party Leadership is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Party Leadership
Topic details
Total words: 8,664
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510057.0% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.1%15.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 10.8%10.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos