Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video815 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Parties results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 65.5% saturation with 1,068 hits. Analysis detected 3,017 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,630 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (1,843 of 16,562 topics). This Parties is worse (more manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group.
Parties
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠89%Parties (selected)9%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,630
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

89% percentile
025507510088.9% percentile
8.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 65.5%65.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.2%4.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 15.6%15.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 17.2%17.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.8%9.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.7%3.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 65.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.3%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos