Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video747 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Parliamentary Procedure results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 656 hits. Analysis detected 4,473 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (4,934 of 16,558 topics). This Parliamentary Procedure is worse (more manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group.
Parliamentary Procedure
Topic details
Total words: 2,988
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.2% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 21.9%21.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.0%12.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.8%19.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.7%11.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos