Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video414 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Park Slope results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 302 hits. Analysis detected 708 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,656 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (11,237 of 16,562 topics). This Park Slope is better (less manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group.
Park Slope
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠33%Park Slope (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,656
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510032.2% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 18.2%18.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos