Topic summary
17%1 analyzed article/video917 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Park Maintenance results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 241 hits. Analysis detected 1,881 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,668 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 23% (12,858 of 16,562 topics). This Park Maintenance is better (less manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group.
Park Maintenance
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,668
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510022.4% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Special Pleading: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Middle Ground: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos