Topic summary
⁠55%2 analyzed articles/videos1,360 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Park Development results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, In-Group Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 380 hits. Analysis detected 2,172 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,462 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (16,115 of 23,094 topics). This Park Development is better (less manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group.
Park Development
Topic details
Total words: 4,462
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.2% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos