Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Paralympics results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 251 hits. Analysis detected 1,915 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,660 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,447 topics). This Paralympics is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Paralympics
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,660
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos