Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos759 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Palisades Fire results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.5% saturation with 1,169 hits. Analysis detected 6,550 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,413 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (5,430 of 16,452 topics). This Palisades Fire is worse (more manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group.
Palisades Fire
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,413
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510067.0% percentile
4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 24.4%24.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 26.5%26.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.5%12.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 6.1%6.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 26.5%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos