Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Paige Vanzant results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 971 hits. Analysis detected 4,271 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,582 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Paige Vanzant is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Paige Vanzant
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,582
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 27.1%27.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.7%13.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 10.6%10.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 27.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos