Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video770 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pablo Escobar results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 443 hits. Analysis detected 2,566 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,310 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (4,949 of 16,636 topics). This Pablo Escobar is worse (more manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group.
Pablo Escobar
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,310
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.3% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 8.0%8.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.9%15.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 19.2%19.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 19.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 2.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Middle Ground: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.1%Indoctrination: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos