Topic summary
⁠22%1 analyzed article/video596 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ozone Park results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 314 hits. Analysis detected 1,334 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,788 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (6,959 of 16,452 topics). This Ozone Park is worse (more manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group.
Ozone Park
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,788
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.7% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.7%12.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos