Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,360 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oz Pearlman results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 1,136 hits. Analysis detected 6,129 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,440 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (6,595 of 16,562 topics). This Oz Pearlman is worse (more manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group.
Oz Pearlman
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,440
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510060.2% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.5%11.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.0%11.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.5%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos