Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video361 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Overdose results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Confirmation Bias, and Horn Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 213 hits. Analysis detected 1,487 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,083 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (3,020 of 16,562 topics). This Overdose is worse (more manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group.
Overdose
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,083
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

82% percentile
025507510081.8% percentile
6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 12.4%12.4%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 10.3%10.3%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 11.5%11.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Horn Effect: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 1.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Red Herring: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 0.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos