Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 933 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Outreach results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 243 hits . Analysis detected 2,030 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,732 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (12,483 of 16,345 topics). This Outreach is better (less manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group. Outreach
Topic details
Total words: 3,732
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.6% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst