Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Ottawa Senators results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 44.3% saturation with 501 hits. Analysis detected 2,875 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,131 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,707 topics). This Ottawa Senators is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Ottawa Senators
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,131
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 44.3%44.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 42.4%42.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 25.5%25.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 19.6%19.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 11.8%11.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 13.5%13.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 10.6%10.6%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 8.3%8.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 11.1%11.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 44.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 42.4%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 25.5%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 19.6%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Horn Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.0%Bandwagon: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos