Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos4,358 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oscars results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 3,016 hits. Analysis detected 20,030 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,963 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (7,077 of 16,562 topics). This Oscars is worse (more manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group.
Oscars
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 14,963
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510057.3% percentile
3.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles15K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.4%4.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.2%20.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 15.7%15.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.7%7.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos