Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Organic Food results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Optimism Bias , and Anecdotal , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26% saturation with 521 hits . Analysis detected 2,841 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,001 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 83% (2,870 of 16,562 topics). This Organic Food is worse (more manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group. Organic Food
Topic details
Total words: 2,001
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.7% percentile 6.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 21.6% 21.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 19.4% 19.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.2% 6.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 26.0%, sitewide 26.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Middle Ground: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.1% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst