Topic summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video725 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oregon Wildfires results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Recency Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 290 hits. Analysis detected 1,868 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (6,643 of 23,044 topics). This Oregon Wildfires is worse (more manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group.
Oregon Wildfires
Topic details
Total words: 2,900
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510071.2% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.0%10.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.8%5.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.6%8.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos