Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Orchestra results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 42.3% saturation with 1,458 hits. Analysis detected 4,894 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,444 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Orchestra is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Orchestra
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Orchestra (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 3,444
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 42.3%42.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 35.3%35.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 10.9%10.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.5%1.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 42.3%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 35.3%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos