Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video627 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Orange County results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Overconfidence Bias, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 308 hits. Analysis detected 1,569 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,508 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (9,183 of 16,562 topics). This Orange County is better (less manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Orange County
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,508
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.6% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 8.4%8.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.3%12.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos