Topic summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video2,262 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Opioid Settlements results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 927 hits. Analysis detected 5,633 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,786 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (12,265 of 16,490 topics). This Opioid Settlements is better (less manipulative) than 74.40% of the peer group.
Opioid Settlements
Topic details
Total words: 6,786
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510025.6% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.7%13.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos