Topic summary
⁠50%1 analyzed article/video1,386 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Opioid Settlement Funds results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 572 hits. Analysis detected 3,958 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,158 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,185 of 16,562 topics). This Opioid Settlement Funds is better (less manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group.
Opioid Settlement Funds
Topic details
Total words: 4,158
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.5% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.2%5.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.0%7.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos