Topic summary
⁠53%1 analyzed article/video1,128 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Operational Efficiency results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 597 hits. Analysis detected 3,971 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,512 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,715 of 16,562 topics). This Operational Efficiency is worse (more manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Operational Efficiency
Topic details
Total words: 4,512
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510053.4% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 13.2%13.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.7%9.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.8%7.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.7%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.5%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos