Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Online Scams results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 773 hits. Analysis detected 5,246 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,928 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Online Scams is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Online Scams
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,928
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.2%9.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.7%15.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.4%8.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos