Topic summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video456 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Online Extremism results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 36.3% saturation with 497 hits. Analysis detected 2,335 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (2,168 of 16,562 topics). This Online Extremism is worse (more manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group.
Online Extremism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,368
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

87% percentile
025507510086.9% percentile
7.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 36.3%36.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 10.1%10.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 10.5%10.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.1%13.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 17.2%17.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.4%6.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.3%5.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.4%12.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 36.3%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.4%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos